<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CmdrSlack.com</title>
	<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com</link>
	<description>Still Ostentatious.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Beer Geek to Beverage Nerd &#8212; Blogginess Level High by CmdrSlack</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/06/03/from-beer-geek-to-beverage-nerd-blogginess-level-high/#comment-9180</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/06/03/from-beer-geek-to-beverage-nerd-blogginess-level-high/#comment-9180</guid>
					<description>Heh, I should really change the name at dot whatever part of the contact to something that I actually check. 

As interweb-stupid as this sounds, I'll contact ya via myspace and whatnot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, I should really change the name at dot whatever part of the contact to something that I actually check. </p>
<p>As interweb-stupid as this sounds, I&#8217;ll contact ya via myspace and whatnot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Beer Geek to Beverage Nerd &#8212; Blogginess Level High by Morgan Ramsay</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/06/03/from-beer-geek-to-beverage-nerd-blogginess-level-high/#comment-9059</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/06/03/from-beer-geek-to-beverage-nerd-blogginess-level-high/#comment-9059</guid>
					<description>I've been trying to get a hold of you for awhile. I've sent you e-mails. Asked Brian if he had more accurate contact info on you. I even left you a voicemail! What'd you do: blacklist the whole entertainment industry? Get back to us, man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to get a hold of you for awhile. I&#8217;ve sent you e-mails. Asked Brian if he had more accurate contact info on you. I even left you a voicemail! What&#8217;d you do: blacklist the whole entertainment industry? Get back to us, man!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arcadia IPA, Prove Your Worth by Baldrake</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/03/08/arcadia-ipa-prove-your-worth/#comment-6347</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/03/08/arcadia-ipa-prove-your-worth/#comment-6347</guid>
					<description>You bet I do, Frodo!

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bet I do, Frodo!</p>
<p>;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arcadia IPA, Prove Your Worth by CmdrSlack</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/03/08/arcadia-ipa-prove-your-worth/#comment-6297</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/03/08/arcadia-ipa-prove-your-worth/#comment-6297</guid>
					<description>Don't you have an epic mount for which to grind? :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you have an epic mount for which to grind? :p
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arcadia IPA, Prove Your Worth by Baldrake</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/03/08/arcadia-ipa-prove-your-worth/#comment-6260</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/03/08/arcadia-ipa-prove-your-worth/#comment-6260</guid>
					<description>NEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRDDDDD!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRDDDDD!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Panopticon High School by little yang</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/03/07/panopticon-high-school/#comment-6249</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/03/07/panopticon-high-school/#comment-6249</guid>
					<description>Interesting stuff. From a sociological perspective, your idea of socializing kids to ignore or, worse, not even recognize surveillance, is pretty dead on.  I think the important factor to remember is that it's unlikely that this is a vast government conspiracy, but is probably being pushed for well-enough meaning reasons in response to very real fears.  Yet, that is the way systems usually go, sociologically speaking.  1 company owning 6 tv stations may let them operate independently with no interference, but slowly but surely, policies will be enacted not allowing negative coverage of said company.  

As for possible alternatives, I'm not sure what there could be.  Hysteria that parents often exhibit is hard to counter for fear of being accused of not caring about kids.  And, as you well, know, horrendous things are enacted to "keep our children safe."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. From a sociological perspective, your idea of socializing kids to ignore or, worse, not even recognize surveillance, is pretty dead on.  I think the important factor to remember is that it&#8217;s unlikely that this is a vast government conspiracy, but is probably being pushed for well-enough meaning reasons in response to very real fears.  Yet, that is the way systems usually go, sociologically speaking.  1 company owning 6 tv stations may let them operate independently with no interference, but slowly but surely, policies will be enacted not allowing negative coverage of said company.  </p>
<p>As for possible alternatives, I&#8217;m not sure what there could be.  Hysteria that parents often exhibit is hard to counter for fear of being accused of not caring about kids.  And, as you well, know, horrendous things are enacted to &#8220;keep our children safe.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kiddie Games by CmdrSlack.com &#187; Gaming Update &#8212; Not Too Much</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/01/16/kiddie-games/#comment-5090</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/01/16/kiddie-games/#comment-5090</guid>
					<description>[...] Probelm Two: I obsessively play MMOs. Not to the catass extent, but if I&#8217;m engaged in playing an MMO, I play at least twice or thrice a week. This tends to cut into &#8220;second job research gig&#8221; time. My main gaming achievement is being able to do every level of the game mentioned in this post in one pass. Problem Three: I&#8217;m not really paying too much attention to the industry. My goofing off online time is spent trying to keep up with various forums and whatnot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Probelm Two: I obsessively play MMOs. Not to the catass extent, but if I&#8217;m engaged in playing an MMO, I play at least twice or thrice a week. This tends to cut into &#8220;second job research gig&#8221; time. My main gaming achievement is being able to do every level of the game mentioned in this post in one pass. Problem Three: I&#8217;m not really paying too much attention to the industry. My goofing off online time is spent trying to keep up with various forums and whatnot. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blizzard Suing Peons4Hire for In-Game Spam by Blizzard puts Peons4Hire out of work &#124; Warcraft-News.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2007/05/26/blizzard-suing-peons4hire-for-in-game-spam/#comment-4606</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2007/05/26/blizzard-suing-peons4hire-for-in-game-spam/#comment-4606</guid>
					<description>[...] This is probably the best news I&#8217;ve heard so far all year: Blizzard has won an injunction against Peons4Hire (we&#8217;ll say their name now), which means that the one-time constant chat spammer is now legally banned from interfering with the game. It sounds like Blizzard sued on nearly all the causes that were speculated on a while ago, and as a conclusion, have outright won their case: according to the injunction, In Game Dollar (the company that advertised Peons4Hire) is &#8220;permanently enjoined&#8221; from &#8220;making any use of the World of Warcraft in-game communication or chat system to advertise any website, business, or commercial endeavor.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This is probably the best news I&#8217;ve heard so far all year: Blizzard has won an injunction against Peons4Hire (we&#8217;ll say their name now), which means that the one-time constant chat spammer is now legally banned from interfering with the game. It sounds like Blizzard sued on nearly all the causes that were speculated on a while ago, and as a conclusion, have outright won their case: according to the injunction, In Game Dollar (the company that advertised Peons4Hire) is &#8220;permanently enjoined&#8221; from &#8220;making any use of the World of Warcraft in-game communication or chat system to advertise any website, business, or commercial endeavor.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kiddie Games by Grimwell</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/01/16/kiddie-games/#comment-4167</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2008/01/16/kiddie-games/#comment-4167</guid>
					<description>That's the dirty little secret of kids games... some of them are damn good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the dirty little secret of kids games&#8230; some of them are damn good!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beer Review: Anchor Christmas Ale by CmdrSlack</title>
		<link>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2007/12/01/beer-review-anchor-christmas-ale/#comment-4157</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cmdrslack.com/2007/12/01/beer-review-anchor-christmas-ale/#comment-4157</guid>
					<description>I know this is a rather late response, but sure...if you're still working on the idea, let me know and I'll gladly toss some stuff you way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is a rather late response, but sure&#8230;if you&#8217;re still working on the idea, let me know and I&#8217;ll gladly toss some stuff you way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
